AI Agent Development

Custom AI Agents for Business Operations

We build AI agents that do multi-step work inside your systems: research a request, pull the records, decide, act, and report, with guardrails and a person in the loop where the stakes require it. Designed for production, evaluated on your cases, operated after launch.

Who This Is For

Built for work that needs judgment across several systems

  • Operations teams where a single request touches email, CRM, documents, a calendar, and a spreadsheet before it is done.
  • Sales and service organizations that want instant, accurate follow-up on every lead and ticket without adding headcount.
  • Companies with internal experts who spend their day answering the same questions from colleagues and customers.
  • Businesses that tried a chatbot and need something that can actually take action and be trusted to do so.

Agents We Build

From single-task agents to orchestrated teams

Intake and follow-up agents

Answer inbound requests, gather missing details, qualify, update the CRM, and schedule the next step across email, chat, WhatsApp, and voice.

Research and preparation agents

Assemble the file before a human acts: pull records, summarize history, check policies, draft the response or the quote.

Back-office agents

Process documents, reconcile data between systems, chase approvals, and produce reports with exceptions flagged for review.

Internal expert assistants

Answer staff questions from your knowledge base, procedures, and past cases, with citations and escalation to the right owner.

Voice-enabled agents

Agents that work over the phone on our Asterisk-based voice stack, so the same logic serves calls, chat, and email.

Multi-agent workflows

Orchestrated agents with LangGraph for long-running processes: planning, execution, verification, and reporting steps with checkpoints.

Agents that earn trust in stages

An AI agent is only useful if it can act, and only acceptable if it can be trusted to act. DPI resolves that tension with staged autonomy. The agent starts read-only, producing drafts and recommendations your team reviews. When its judgment matches yours on the evaluation set, it moves to suggest-and-approve. Autonomous action is granted per case type once the numbers justify it, and high-impact actions keep a human sign-off permanently.

Engineering that makes agents reliable

Reliability comes from the parts around the model: precise tool definitions with permission scopes, retrieval that grounds the agent in your records and procedures, memory that persists across steps in PostgreSQL, confidence thresholds that route uncertainty to people, and logs that let anyone replay a decision. We orchestrate with LangChain and LangGraph, which gives long-running workflows checkpoints, retries, and clean hand-offs between specialized agents.

Evaluation is built before the agent. We collect real requests, define correct outcomes with your team, and score every version of the agent against them. The same evaluation runs when a model is updated or your data changes, so drift is caught before customers notice.

Models and hosting

Agents can run on OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, AWS Bedrock, or self-hosted models such as Qwen on infrastructure you control. Mixed deployments are common: a strong hosted model for planning and reasoning, a small private model for routine extraction and classification. Data is minimized before prompts, and sensitive workloads stay inside your environment.

What an agent deployment returns

Tasks completed without human touch, response times for leads and requests, escalation rate and reasons, error rate versus the manual baseline, and cost per task. These are reported monthly alongside the evaluation results and the next tools or case types queued for the agent.

How It Works

How we deliver an agent

  1. Task and tool inventory

    We define what the agent must accomplish, which systems it may read and write, and what it must never do without a person.

  2. Architecture and guardrails

    Model selection, tool design, memory and retrieval, permission scopes, confidence thresholds, escalation paths, and logging.

  3. Evaluation on your cases

    A test set built from real requests. The agent is measured for accuracy, safety, and cost before it touches production.

  4. Staged rollout

    Read-only first, then suggest-and-approve, then autonomous action for the cases that proved safe. Every step monitored.

  5. Operation and improvement

    Evaluations rerun as models and data change, new tools added, failure cases reviewed, monthly reporting on outcomes.

Stack & Integrations

Agent stack

We build with LangChain and LangGraph, run models hosted or self-hosted, keep memory and retrieval in PostgreSQL with pgvector or Qdrant, and connect to your tools through APIs.

LangChain and LangGraph OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, AWS Bedrock Self-hosted Qwen and open-source LLMs PostgreSQL, pgvector, Qdrant, Redis HubSpot, Salesforce, custom CRMs Google Workspace, Google Calendar Mailgun email, SMS, WhatsApp Business API Asterisk voice stack Node.js, Python, TypeScript Docker, Kubernetes, AWS

Industries

Agents by industry

Real Estate

Lead follow-up, showing coordination, tenant request handling, owner reporting.

Financial Services

Onboarding follow-up, file completeness checks, compliance preparation.

Private Equity

Portfolio reporting, diligence document review, operational assessments.

Engagement Models

Engagement models

Agent discovery

Two to three weeks: task inventory, tool and permission map, architecture, evaluation plan, and rollout stages.

Build and evaluate

Fixed-scope delivery of the first agent through evaluation and staged rollout, with your team reviewing every stage.

Managed agents

Ongoing evaluation, monitoring, tool additions, model updates, and reporting on tasks completed, escalations, and cost.

FAQ

Questions about AI agent development

What is the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?

A chatbot answers. An agent acts: it reads your systems, decides on a course of action, uses tools to carry it out, and reports back. That power is why agents need permission scopes, evaluation, and escalation rules, which is most of the engineering.

How do you keep an agent from doing something harmful?

Permission scopes limit what it can read and write. High-impact actions require confirmation or a person. Confidence thresholds route uncertain cases to review. Every action is logged. And the agent is rolled out in stages, starting read-only.

Which models do you use?

Whichever fits the task and your data rules: OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, AWS Bedrock, or self-hosted open-source models such as Qwen. Many deployments mix models, using a strong hosted model for reasoning and a smaller self-hosted model for routine steps.

How do you measure whether the agent works?

With an evaluation set built from your real requests, scored for accuracy, safety, and cost before launch and rerun whenever models or data change. Production metrics track tasks completed, escalations, errors, and time saved.

Can the agent work over the phone as well as email?

Yes. The same agent logic can run on our Asterisk-based voice stack, so a lead gets the same qualification whether they call, email, or message on WhatsApp.

How long does it take?

A single-task agent with two or three integrations typically reaches staged production within weeks after discovery. Orchestrated multi-agent workflows take longer and are delivered in stages.

Related

Next Step

Bring one workflow. Leave with a production plan.

Tell us where calls, tickets, documents, or approvals pile up. We map the workflow, size the impact, and propose a deployment you can measure.