Intake and triage
Requests from email, forms, chat, and calls classified, extracted into structured records, deduplicated, and routed to the right queue or owner.
AI Workflow Automation
We automate the workflows where your team copies, checks, routes, and re-types: intake from email and forms, document handling, approvals, CRM updates, reporting, and the hand-offs between systems. AI reads and decides, integrations act, people handle the exceptions.
Who This Is For
What We Automate
Requests from email, forms, chat, and calls classified, extracted into structured records, deduplicated, and routed to the right queue or owner.
Invoices, contracts, applications, and reports read, validated against your rules and systems, and filed or forwarded with exceptions flagged.
Records created and updated from conversations and documents, stages moved, tasks assigned, follow-ups scheduled, no copy-paste.
Approval chains with context attached, reminders, escalations on delay, and a full log of who decided what and when.
Weekly and monthly reports assembled from several sources, variances explained, and discrepancies routed for review.
Status updates, confirmations, requests for missing information, and reminders sent by email, SMS, or WhatsApp at the right moment.
Most operational cost is not in the core system; it is in the glue: reading an email and creating the ticket, checking an invoice against the PO, chasing a signature, assembling Friday's report from three exports. Those steps are repetitive, but the input is messy, which is why traditional automation never quite reached them. Language models changed that. They read the email, the PDF, and the call transcript, extract what matters, and decide the next step with a confidence score.
DPI builds automations that combine that reading and deciding with reliable integrations and explicit human control. The result is a workflow that runs on its own for the ordinary cases and asks a person only when the case is genuinely unusual.
Every automation has three parts: extraction and decision logic with confidence thresholds, actions executed through APIs in your systems, and an exception queue where uncertain or high-impact cases wait for a person. We orchestrate with LangChain and LangGraph, keep state in PostgreSQL, and log every step so an auditor can replay what happened and why.
Before cut-over, the automation runs in shadow mode on real cases while your team keeps doing the work. We compare outputs, tune rules and prompts, and only switch when accuracy meets the bar you set. After launch, monitoring and the exception queue keep quality visible.
Most companies already run some automation, and AI does not replace it. Workflow tools such as Zapier, Make, and Power Automate move structured data between cloud apps on a trigger. RPA repeats clicks on screens that have no API. Both stop where the input gets messy, because neither can read. AI business process automation adds the missing layer: it reads the email, the scan, or the transcript, makes the routine decision with a confidence score, and then hands a clean, structured instruction to whatever executes the action, whether that is an API call, an existing workflow, or an RPA bot for the one legacy system nobody can integrate.
That is also how we scope projects. We do not rebuild what already works; we find the steps where people are reading and retyping, and automate those first. A step-by-step version of the method, with a scorecard for choosing the first workflow, is in our playbook on how to automate business processes with AI. Companies that need role-based access, audit logs, and change control across many workflows should start with enterprise AI automation.
Language models are chosen per workflow. Hosted models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or AWS Bedrock where capability and speed matter; self-hosted open-source models such as Qwen where documents must stay in your environment. Data is minimized before it reaches a prompt, and retention rules apply per data type. Healthcare workflows run under a signed BAA.
Hours returned per week, cycle time from request to completion, error rates versus the manual process, and backlog size. We report these monthly with the exceptions reviewed and the next workflow steps queued. Automation done this way compounds: each step added returns more hours and makes the next step easier.
How It Works
We sit with the people who do the work, map every step and system, count the volume, and find the steps worth automating first.
Extraction rules, decision logic, confidence thresholds, human review points, and the exact actions the system may take in each tool.
The automation runs alongside the manual process on real cases. Your team compares results until accuracy meets the agreed bar.
Live cut-over with monitoring and exception queues, then the next steps of the workflow added as each proves out.
Stack & Integrations
We build on LangChain and LangGraph for agentic workflows, PostgreSQL for state, and direct API integrations with the systems your teams already use.
Industries
Lease abstraction, maintenance intake, vendor invoices, owner reporting.
RFI and submittal tracking, field reports, subcontractor documents, compliance packets.
Client intake, engagement letters, document requests, time and status reporting.
Order intake, proof of delivery matching, carrier communication, exception handling.
Onboarding documents, KYC checks, underwriting file review, compliance reporting.
Quality documentation, procurement requests, supplier follow-up, shift reports.
Engagement Models
Two to three weeks: workflow maps, volumes, automation candidates ranked by impact, architecture, and a rollout plan.
Fixed-scope delivery of the first workflow into production, shadow-run validated, with exception handling and training.
Ongoing operation: monitoring, exception review, accuracy tuning, new workflow steps, and monthly reporting on hours returned.
FAQ
Those tools move structured data between apps when a trigger fires. DPI automations read unstructured input, such as emails, PDFs, photos, and call transcripts, decide what to do, and act across systems with human review where it matters. We use such tools where they fit and build custom orchestration where they do not.
It depends on the input and the rules. We measure accuracy on your real cases during the shadow run and set confidence thresholds so uncertain cases go to a person. The agreed accuracy bar is met before cut-over, not promised in advance.
No. Every automated action is logged, exceptions land in a review queue, and actions with financial or compliance impact require approval. Your team sees more of the process than before, not less.
Anything with an API, and most things with a database or file export: CRMs, ERPs, accounting, ticketing, document stores, email, calendars, and internal tools. Custom integrations are part of the build.
Yes. We deploy on OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, and AWS Bedrock, or on self-hosted open-source models such as Qwen when documents and data must stay in your environment.
The first workflow typically reaches production within weeks after discovery, with hours returned visible in the first monthly report. Larger multi-system processes are staged so value arrives step by step.
It is process automation in which a language model does the reading and the routine judgment that used to require a person: understanding an email, a PDF, a form, or a call, and deciding what should happen next. Rules still define what is allowed, integrations carry out the action in your systems, and uncertain or high-impact cases go to a review queue.
The ones with high volume, repetitive cases, real manual cost, and mistakes that are easy to catch: intake from email and forms, invoice and document processing, status requests, CRM updates after calls, report assembly, and appointment handling. Rare, judgment-heavy, or irreversible decisions stay with people, with the AI preparing the case.
Related
Next Step
Tell us where calls, tickets, documents, or approvals pile up. We map the workflow, size the impact, and propose a deployment you can measure.